7/21/2023 0 Comments Frigate ship“We have an extensive laser program in the Navy, we have lasers on some of our ships now. “We didn’t want define discretely where we are going in the future, so having some margin to include things like directed energy and other systems, that’s why it was so important. “Understanding how fast the threat is advancing made the service-life allowance so important for us,” Kilby said April 30. Jim Kilby, the Navy’s top requirements officer, said growth will be important in Navy designs as the service seeks to move away from combating missiles with other missiles. Many of the things that tend to trip up lead ships, we took proactive steps to reduce the risk there.” “In general, even before the solicitation went out, the fact that we had industry involved in the conceptual design phase, they were there with us in the requirements they understood the specifications we worked with them on cost reduction. Casey Moton, program executive officer of unmanned and small combatants.īringing industry in on the process earlier will also help reduce risk in the lead ship, Moton said. “Some of those efforts are still maturing, such as SPY-6, but from my standpoint I’m very comfortable with how that’s proceeding,” said Rear Adm. Among the steps the Navy took to retire risk with FFG(X) was to adapt many of the mature systems being designed for the Flight III destroyer program, including the latest version of the Aegis Combat System and a scaled-down version of the AN/SPY-6 radar destined for Flight III. Improving the Navy’s performance on lead ships, in the wake of the Ford-class debacle, has been a focus of Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Jim Inhofe, R-Okla. Larter)ģ) What could go wrong? The Navy feels like it did a lot to get this ship deal right, which could be argued was important given a not-so-hot track record with programs lately. Sailors stand watch on the bridge of the Italian FREMM Alpino, underway off the Eastern Seaboard in May 2018. The intention is to buy 20 hulls, though it’s unclear whether Marinette will build all 20 or if the Navy will identify a second source. The contract should be wrapped up - all 10 hulls - by 2035. The first ship should be delivered in 2026 and should be operational by 2030, with final operational capability declared by 2032, Geurts said. Detailed design of the future frigate, known as FFG(X), starts right away, Geurts said, and construction will begin no later than April 2022. “The study shows this ship as selected and the program as designed delivering underneath our objective cost per platform,” Geurts said on a April 30 phone call with reporters.Ģ) The timeline. An independent cost estimate found the follow-on hulls should cost about $781 million if all 20 are built. But Geurts thinks he can beat both numbers. The Navy is aiming for a price tag of $800 million in 2018 dollars, with the threshold at $950 million. The next hulls in the buy should cost significantly less.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |